Which navigation system works better? Our individual judge's ratings are based on a 0-to-5-point scale, which results in a final score of 0 to 15 per round. Is the iPod's scroll-wheel navigation simply unbeatable?
| Player | Jasmine | Donald | Josh | Total |
|
Microsoft Zune 80 |
5 Twist interface, multifunctional touch-and-tactile control pad, separate podcast menu, album art thumbnail browsing--what's not to love? Big fan of this interface. |
4 The Zune's new touch-sensitive pad is one of the best improvements Microsoft made from the first-gen series. It may seem silly, but I think the oversize text on the main menu is brilliant. It just feels so easy on the eyes. |
4 The lack of a scroll wheel is noticeable when navigating long lists. As storage increases, Microsoft is going to have to address this with something faster, or a built-in search tool. I really enjoy the twist interface, though. For browsing through albums, it kicks Coverflow's ass. |
13 |
|
Apple iPod Classic |
4 Totally digging the new split-screen interface thing Apple's got going on--the visual experience is great. The Clickwheel has never been my favorite, though. |
4 It's hard to know whether I'm giving the iPod's navigation high marks because I'm so used to it, or because it really is a snappy interface. Either way, the patented wheel interface is like second nature to me. The split-screen view offers a great visual cue to folder contents. |
4 Coverflow is a gimmick, and hardly useful on a day-to-day basis, but it looks pretty. The new side-by-side navigation is neat looking, but I can't help but think it's slowing things down just a tad. I'm giving Apple a bonus point for the integrated search feature, which makes the 160GB flavor a little easier to dig through. |
12 |