-
CNET editors' rating:
3.5 stars
Very good
THE GOOD
Easier XML and CSS integration; rollovers and collapsible code views; background file transfers; better preview rendering.
THE BAD
Web-design novices might find this tool hard to use without first getting schooled on its features; some small interface quirks haven't been fixed.
THE BOTTOM LINE
Faster, easier to use, and more powerful than the previous version, Dreamweaver 8 is a worthy upgrade for professionals, but amateurs should stick with a less complicated app, such as HomeSite.
CNET Reader Reviews
-
December 6, 2005 04:56
4.0/5
I think Macromedia raced to get this one to market. I've been using Dreamweaver since version 2. It's a powerful tool that has evolved into something close to remarkable concerning development of professional web sites/applications. But...
If... read more » -
August 10, 2007 01:31
3.0/5
I know that this program can be used both on various versions of MacOS and Windows. The requirements other than the OS are huge, however: 600-800 MHz and (256 or 512 MB?) of RAM. FrontPage is cheaper, has easier to use interface, plus easy collabora... read more » -
March 27, 2006 04:39
4.5/5
Macromedia Dreamweaver really has done it. It improve the interface makening a slight hard for beginners, but once you know it (It's very easy to learn for previous users, and rewarding) all the functionality make it an indispensable tool for every ... read more »
Similar products
-
Microsoft Office FrontPage 2003
1 user, Complete package, Microsoft Windows XP or later, Microsoft Windows 2000 SP3 or later, 180 MB, Intel Pentium 233 MHz, 128 MB, CD-ROM, SVGA monitor, Intel Pentium, 233 MHz, Windows
