Search:
Go!


Alpha Blog: CNET's gadget & tech news and opinions blogged by our editors
September 12, 2006, 1:39 PM PDT
AMD, meet the Dell Dimension. Dell Dimension, AMD
Posted by: Rich Brown

It's been what, 10 years since AMD's K5 desktop chip came onto the market? In all that time, Dell has turned up its nose at Intel's main rival in the consumer desktop game. Until today, that is. In addition to updating the Dimension E510 midtower to the Core 2 Duo-based Dimension E520, Dell also added Dimension E521 and Dimension C521 models to its mainstream consumer desktop family. The latter two are special because they come with AMD Sempron, Athlon 64, and dual-core Athlon 64 X2 processors in them.

The Dimension E521 is a standard midtower design (as is the E520); the C521 is a sort of small-form-factor wannabe that's a bit larger than Dell's XPS 210, also announced today. All three new systems come with Windows Media Center 2005 and a combination of optical drives, hard drives, and graphics cards that make them solid middle-of-the-road PCs. They all go on sale tomorrow, and prices for the Dimension E520 start at $719, the E521 starts at $329, and the C521 starts at $359.

Given the current state of the processor market, we're not surprised that Dell relegated AMD's chips to the budget end of the spectrum. The Dimension E520 and, as of today, the entire XPS line all have Intel Core 2 Duo chips in them (Pentium D is still an option if you must), giving them the performance edge. But AMD still has the advantage in performance and cost at the lower end of the CPU spectrum. If you're wondering why Dell finally decided to go with AMD after all this time, one theory we've heard is that Dell wasn't happy about Intel working with Apple, and thus crossed the AMD line. If that's true, we expect it's only part of the story. And regardless, the deal is done.

And if you're wondering what they look like, you can try Dell's online photo bank. We couldn't get the Dimension C521's link to work at the time of posting, but perhaps Dell will fix it soon.

TalkBack
3 messages

I'm Glad to see Dell Giving it's Customers choice

Intel just pulled off a coup with it's Core architecture but it took them 5 years to do it. Intel also forced initial buyers of P4 systems to use RDIMMs and had many glitches in the 850 chipset and it was even slower than comparable PIIIs. Intel missed the 32/64 bit desktop processor boat when AMD came out with and it was a success even after Intel said it was ONLY going to 64 bits with Itanium.
Dell has made a wise decision here pitting Intel and AMD against each other for placement in Dell products. When Intel leads the pack then Dell can get a premium for those systems and when AMD leads the pack the same holds true.
While Dell has released desktops with the AMD products in them the killer products are going to be the 2-way and above servers using the Opteron.
HP, Sun, and IBM have had killer Opteron servers out for a good while now while Dell has been losing that end of the server market to them.
Intel has plans on releasing a "hyperTransport" like mechanism named "CSI" but not until 2008-2009. Until that time the only thing Intel can do to make up for their HUB architecture bottleneck is to throw more cache at the processors so it won't be as obvious as to whet the REAL problem is. The upcoming Tulsa Server processors will have 16MB of cache, I rest my case.
by fred dunn (See profile) - September 14, 2006 9:58 AM PDT

DON'T DO IT DELL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The core 2 duo is way better saves power its more powerful its all around better!!! Dont do it dell!!!!
by Carguy172 (See profile) - September 12, 2006 5:16 PM PDT

September 2006 archive

S M Tu W Th F S
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30

for Alpha.CNET.com

advertisement

 
advertisement

Popular on CBS sites: Fantasy Football | Miley Cyrus | MLB | Wii | GPS | Recipes | Mock Draft


© 2008 CNET Networks, Inc., a CBS Company. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use

©2007 CNET Networks, Inc. All rights reserved. CNET, CNET.com and the CNET logo are registered trademarks of CNET Networks, Inc. Used by permission.